Is Apple the Oprah for Indie Bands?

iPodThe new iPod Nano was unveiled in September. (Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Will one of Apple’s new iPod commercials propel a semi-obscure Brooklyn band into the national spotlight?

The technology and media company has done so with other independent acts — earning it a reputation as a tastemaker, doing for bands what Oprah Winfrey has done for books.

While music heavies like Eminem, Bob Dylan and Wynton Marsalis have also been called upon for Apple ads, it’s the independent musicians that have benefited most. A number of bands and singers have sold thousands of downloads, placed on Billboard charts and earned an international fan base after their songs were used for iPod commercials.

For these bands, the iPod is almost like an iGod.

The singer-songwriter Leslie Feist also had her catchy composition, “1, 2, 3, 4,” featured in an iPod Nano commercial last year, which lifted sales and helped secure her a highly coveted musical guest spot on “Saturday Night Live.

Search queries like “iPod Nano commercial song,” “iPod Nano song,” and “iPod Nano commercial” all jumped more than 350 percent in one weekend, according to Yahoo. It seemed as if everyone wanted to know who possessed the raspy voice behind the “1, 2, 3, 4.”

And another song, “Music is My Hot, Hot Sex,” by a Brazilian band, CSS, was selected by an 18-year-old student in Britain for a homemade commercial for the iPod Touch.

That ad, which was originally posted on YouTube, was viewed by Apple’s advertising agency, which invited the student to adapt it for a professional commercial broadcast during football games, during “Desperate Housewives” and in Game 4 of the World Series. That sent a year-old song by a foreign band onto the Pop 100 chart.

And an iPod Touch commercial features a song, “Around the Bend” by the Asteroids Galaxy Tour, which has garnered some fans already.

ChairliftChairlift’s debut album, “Does You Inspire You.”

Now the latest iPod Nano commercial uses a a psychedelic song, “Bruises,” performed by a Brooklyn band called Chairlift.

The band was formed two years ago by three friends — Caroline Polachek performing vocals, Patrick Wimberly on drums, Aaron Pfenning on guitar — who met at the University of Colorado. The band’s first album, “Does You Inspire You,” is being released in November by Kanine Records, but elements of it have already been available on Amazon and iTunes.

The process of getting selected for an iPod commercial is hardly as open as an “American Idol” showdown.

“We don’t really know how they picked us,” Mr. Wembley said. “They contacted us out of the blue about three days before we were going to play in L.A.” A man who said he was a representative for Apple said he wanted to see the band perform because the team was thinking of using a Chairlift song for a commercial.

“We put him on the guest list,” Mr. Wembley said. “We didn’t meet him or talk to him or talk to him directly. They’re really secretive. They want to keep their new campaigns top secret, so top seret that they are not even letting the band know they are going to be the song on the commercial.”

They saw the album pop up to to between No. 60 and 80 on iTunes. The “Bruises” single landed within the top 10 sellers in the alternative music category.

“They have set themselves up as tastemakers when it comes to music,” said Mr. Wembley, of Apple. That gives the band credibility despite the fact the song is being used in a commercial, albeit one for a music device and store. “We wouldn’t have done the commercial for anybody. We wouldn’t have done an S.U.V. commercial.”

In contrast, John Mellencamp caught flak from some of his fans for licensing his song, “Our Country,” for a Silverado spot that mixes images of the Statue of Liberty and Rosa Parks with footage from Hurricane Katrina and the Vietnam War.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

It’s fun to see the dinosaurs like John Mellencamp and Springsteen try to “stay young” by opting out their songs to corporations w/bad reputations. Apple seems to get a pass from corp-haters, for some reason, and validity of “coolness” is bestowed upon those whose work gets highlighted.

//swine.wordpress.com

To #1:

This article does not mention Bruce Springsteen. If you knew anything about him or his music you would realize that a) he’s not trying to “stay young” as you claim – his lyrics and music have changed and matured just as he has as a person, and b) he doesn’t sell his music to “corporations w/ bad reputations” – he is very conscious of how his music is distributed and where it gets used. It’s irresponsible of you to speak of something about which you clearly know nothing.

It’s not that people think a song is cool because it was used in an Apple commercial — it’s that Apple selects excellent songs that you’ve never heard before, let’s them play for a full 30 seconds, and provides eye-catching visuals to go along with them. If Apple used an already well-known song in a commercial, I doubt people would rush to download it, because it wouldn’t have that aura of freshness around it.

Which is to say, Apple is a tastemaker because Apple has good taste.

Just one thing, Swine: What product has a Bruce song attached again? Right.

I look forward to new Apple ads as they always expand my musical horizons. The performers they select are so interesting and fun that, while blowing over the commercials on recorded programs, I often pause to actually play the Apple ads.

Man, Bruce fans are flippin’ out!

Overall, I think most young people understand that licensing is one of the few revenue streams available to musicians.

Here’s how it works: if you have a lot of money (e.g., The Rolling Stones) it is lame to license for the money. If you don’t (e.g., Feist) it’s acceptable, even if the product is lame (e.g., Old 97s remaking their song to be about Chili’s). If you’re rich and refuse to license your songs, that’s cool (especially if you’re John Densmore holding out while the rest of the band wants to cash in). If you have no money and you refuse to license (e.g., Ian MacKaye), you’re really, really cool. If Pizza Hut’s ad agency asks you to write a song for them and you send them two versions of “Where the mother****ing cheese at?” then you are God (Ween Satan).

ummm… isn’t bruce doing the halftime show for the next superbowl? that’s not commercial enough for ya?

I think they used Leslie for two commercials. I hit YouTube to see her videos and from there went Amazon to buy the albums.

They are good at finding off the mainstream artists that work well in the adds I will say. I like most of the market from new age to metal (with exception of todays country). So almost anything is go for me.

In fact I think Apple may have fun if they were to try a retro take on the original 1985 Commercial (hammer through the glass) they did in the Superbowl but make it an iPod or something. Sad thing is almost nobody would get the inside joke.

Don’t forget the Caesars “Jerk It Out” from the first of those Apple silhouette commercials. That gave them their 15 minutes and started the re-emergent trend of the indie song on the corporate commercial.

If an Apple commercial is only non internet medium for these bands to be heard, then I think that sounds great for everybody. However, fans can be pretty fickle (see, Feist) and these commercials are really walking a fine line. True “tastemakers” have been gushing over Chairlift, so I doubt anyone will care. But a big part of the reason why these people like bands like Chairlift, is because they are relatively unknown. Its an interesting catch 22.

It’s almost a fact that small-time,full-time musicians cant survive on record sales and a few live shows only; they/we have to have full-time, dayjobs, unfortunately; so getting picked for iPod ads is somewhat like a winning lottery ticket. Who gets it? who knows?

MK

//www.myspace.com/microfilmmusic

It’s not that people think a song is cool because it was used in an Apple commercial — it’s that Apple selects excellent songs that you’ve never heard before, let’s them play for a full 30 seconds, and provides eye-catching visuals to go along with them. If Apple used an already well-known song in a commercial, I doubt people would rush to download it, because it wouldn’t have that aura of freshness around it.

the intangibles indie prog rock intangiblesny
intangiblesny.com theintangibles from New york city!

It’s not that I hate Apple, believe me, I love Apple…I have an iPod and a MacBook, and I love them. But I’m sick of them “launching the poor starving indie artist’s careers.” Bands I *used* to like, like Feist and Chairlift have now become something I can’t stand to hear. I’ve heard that damn “1,2,3” song and “Bruises” so many times that I want to throw my iPod onto the subway tracks every time they come on shuffle.

Not that I don’t like seeing bands get the attention they deserve, but the way the media goes crazy over the new iPod band is ridiculous. They were out there before, and just because Apple puts them in a commercial, doesn’t mean there aren’t hundreds of other good bands being unnoticed. Think for yourself, and search out bands because you like their sound, not because Apple puts them on a commercial.