Can trials heal the wounds of war?
A new book looks at the legacy of Japan’s war-crimes tribunal
THE WORLD IS still haunted by 20th-century crimes so grave that any attempt to bring the perpetrators to justice seems feeble. The trials at Nuremberg in 1945-46 did little to salve wounds left by the Holocaust. And the Tokyo trials of alleged Japanese war criminals, which lasted two and a half years from 1946-48, have not stopped outpourings of anger across Asia whenever, for example, a senior Japanese politician visits Yasukuni, a Tokyo shrine to the war-dead, including convicted war criminals.
The aftermath of wars has taken on fresh significance with conflicts raging in Israel, Sudan and Ukraine. In much of Asia, the second world war, which was followed by tribunals that tried to dispense justice, is still unfinished business. Japan’s trials concluded 75 years ago. In a meticulously researched history, Gary Bass, a professor at Princeton (and former journalist for The Economist), looks at why attempts to produce a shared sense of justice failed.
This article appeared in the Culture section of the print edition under the headline "The scales of injustice"
More from Culture
The NHL failed in Arizona, but it’s succeeding in America
Ice hockey is flourishing as an increasingly American sport
True tales of secrecy, opacity and outright thievery in art
Two outsiders tried to crack the art business. They did not like what they found
For a colossal challenge, try tower-running
The sport, which involves hurrying up high-rises, is ascendant